Go to page
 

Bibliographic Metadata

Title
Extending agency : the merit of relational approaches for childhood studies / Eberhard Raithelhuber
AuthorRaithelhuber, Eberhard In der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Published in
Reconceptualising Agency and Childhood: New perspectives in Childhood Studies / Florian Esser; Meike S. Baader; Tanja Betz; Beatrice Hungerland (Hrsg.), page 89-101
PublishedLondon : Taylor & Francis, 2016
Edition
Elektronische Ressource
LanguageEnglish
Document typeJournal Article
ISBN9781138854192
URNurn:nbn:at:at-ubs:3-4584 Persistent Identifier (URN)
Restriction-Information
 The work is publicly available
Files
Extending agency [0.36 mb]
Links
Reference
Classification
Abstract (English)

Current discussions on the concept of agency in the inter- and multidisciplinary field of Childhood Studies are a reaction to the deficits revealed in the way the New Sociology of Childhood has viewed agency: as an attempt to gain a more nuanced, differentiated understanding of agency on both an empirical and a theoretical level. My intention here is to contribute to the current reconceptualisation of agency, but not in the sense of providing a better or more nuanced understanding of individual or human agency. Quite the contrary, I argue for a different understanding of agency as social and collective, which allows for different sensitivities and methodologies in research on childhood. I will bring into play selected contributions on agency in the social theory and social anthropology of the last two decades that share a relational/ relativistic approach towards the social. The core argument that I want to push forward is that a relational conception of agency can be one productive reaction towards the claim by Prout and others that we need to reflect on existing understandings of agency in the field, all the time striving for a qualitatively different approach toward agency. This perspective turns away from predominantly intentional and cognitive understandings of agency. Hence, agents are not substantialised agents, but often consist of overlapping entities or fabrics, which are complex and in motion. Consequently, agency can be seen as a realised, situated and permuted capacity, which can be accomplished through the combination of various interconnected “persons” and “things”.

Notice
Stats
The PDF-Document has been downloaded 27 times.
License
CC-BY-License (4.0)Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License