Go to page
 

Bibliographic Metadata

Title
Automatic classification of the sub-techniques (gears) used in cross-country ski skating employing a mobile phone
AuthorStöggl, Thomas In der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen ; Holst, Anders ; Jonasson, Arndt ; Andersson, Erik ; Wunsch, Tobias ; Norström, Christer ; Holmberg, Hans-Christer
Published in
Sensors, Basel, 2015, Vol. 14, Issue 11, page 20589-20601
PublishedMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2015
LanguageEnglish
Document typeJournal Article
Keywords (EN)algorithm / collective classification / gaussian filter / individual classification / markov chain / machine learning / smartphone
URNurn:nbn:at:at-ubs:3-1514 Persistent Identifier (URN)
DOI10.3390/s141120589 
Restriction-Information
 The work is publicly available
Files
Automatic classification of the sub-techniques (gears) used in cross-country ski skating employing a mobile phone [1.76 mb]
Links
Reference
Classification
Abstract (English)

The purpose of the current study was to develop and validate an automatic algorithm for classification of cross-country (XC) ski-skating gears (G) using Smartphone accelerometer data. Eleven XC skiers (seven men, four women) with regional-to-international levels of performance carried out roller skiing trials on a treadmill using fixed gears (G2left, G2right, G3, G4left, G4right) and a 950-m trial using different speeds and inclines, applying gears and sides as they normally would. Gear classification by the Smartphone (on the chest) and based on video recordings were compared. Formachine-learning, a collective database was compared to individual data. The Smartphone application identified the trials with fixed gears correctly in all cases. In the 950-m trial, participants executed 140 22 cycles as assessed by video analysis, with the automatic Smartphone application giving a similar value. Based on collective data, gears were identified correctly 86.0% 8.9% of the time, a value that rose to 90.3% 4.1% (P < 0.01) with machine learning from individual data. Classification was most often incorrect during transition between gears, especially to or from G3. Identification was most often correct for skiers who made relatively few transitions between gears. The accuracy of the automatic procedure for identifying G2left, G2right, G3, G4left and G4right was 96%, 90%, 81%, 88% and 94%, respectively. The algorithm identified gears correctly 100% of the time when a single gear was used and 90% of the time when different gears were employed during a variable protocol. This algorithm could be improved with respect to identification of transitions between gears or the side employed within a given gear.

License
CC-BY-License (4.0)Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License